An ongoing discussion among bosses of moving companies concerns the extent to which moving companies should pamper their employees and give them a taste of the good life. The pros of the good life maintain that moving companies should look beyond the immediate aims of company business and concerns and share in the welfare and social well being of their employees. Those who oppose this attitude among the moving companies are the bosses who see their companies as working machines and nothing more. The latter claims that the job of moving companies is to transport merchandise or relocate families to new locations and that's that. They do not see the grand picture. Naturally an objective view of moving companies would claim that there should be a compromise: business concerns of course, however take care of the workers in the moving companies too. Needless to say, this argument does not merely revolve around moving companies. The welfare of employees has been an ongoing concern ev!
er
since the industrial revolution in the latter half of the eighteenth century in England. It seems that as with moving companies today, the welfare of employees is a long and ever developing process. The fact is that the good life for employees of moving companies is in no way the concepts ever considered in the eighteenth century.